Everyday activity critical to weight loss
January 27, 2005
Ordinary daily movements can shed pounds, research finds
It turns out some couch potatoes spend more time on the couch than
others. And that could be a key to obesity.
Researchers at the Mayo Clinic believe it’s not the trips
to the gym, but the everyday pacing, fidgeting and restlessness
that may play a bigger role in whether someone’s fat or thin,
according to a small study of self-described couch potatoes.
The scientists found that the obese people they studied sat for
about 150 minutes more a day on average than their lean subjects,
and that meant they burned about 350 fewer calories a day.
The researchers looked at the role of routine activities such as
sitting, standing, walking and talking.
If the overweight subjects could match the behavior of their lean
counterparts, that could work out to a weight loss of about 33 pounds
a year, the study said. And it’s not necessary to go to the
gym to do that.
“I think our study is a beacon of hope, because 50 years
ago our biology was the same, but obesity was not prevalent in America,”
said the study’s lead author, endocrinologist James Levine.
“If we can revert to the activity levels of 50 years ago,
we have the potential to reverse our obesity.”
Levine, it should be noted, is no couch potato and certainly not
overweight. He spoke by telephone while walking 0.7 mph on a treadmill
in his office, where he’s set up a computer above the machine
so he can walk and work at the same time.
Differences in brain chemistry
The activity deficit in the overweight subjects didn’t reflect
a lack of motivation, Levine said. Instead, he said, it probably
indicates a difference in brain chemistry because even when the
obese volunteers lost weight, they didn’t sit still any less.
Conversely, he said, when the lean subjects gained weight, they
didn’t sit around any more.
The researchers recruited 10 mildly obese and 10 lean people to
wear special underwear, which used technology developed for fighter
jet control panels. Sensors embedded in the undergarments recorded
their postures and movements every half-second, 24 hours a day,
for 10 days.
The underpants look like bicycle shorts; the tops resemble undershirts
for the men and sports bras for the women.
The volunteers went about their normal lives except that they ate
all their meals at a Rochester hospital, scraping up every speck
to leave no calorie behind.
In the next phase, the researchers fed the lean volunteers an extra
1,000 calories a day for 10 more days so they would put on pounds.
The obese volunteers’ meals were cut by 1,000 calories a day
so they would shed weight.
Some 150 million lines of data were collected. Levine said it’s
the first time so much hard data has been compiled to show the different
activity levels between lean and overweight people.
Levine said this field of study — non-exercise activity thermogenesis
— has become so hot that he envisions the next decade will
see much more emphasis on it, leading to “a world of activity
and happy, active people.”
The Mayo study was reported in this week’s issue of the journal
Science.
Mark Pereira, an obesity researcher at the University of Minnesota
who wasn’t involved in the Mayo study, called it a significant
step in nailing down the role such activity in obesity. He said
the results from under- and overfeeding the volunteers provides
good evidence that some fundamental biological characteristic is
at work.
His colleague in the university’s epidemiology division,
David Jacobs, said it’s useful to have such hard data because
people typically don’t have an accurate idea of how much they
move or don’t. “The ability to separate movement from
non-movement is a critical issue,” he said.
Jacobs also cautioned that there’s no simple answer to the
problem of obesity, and that a lot of other factors contribute,
including overeating. But he said other research also has shown
that overweight people tend to conserve their movements.
“I guess the question is how you get a couch potato who is
a non-mover to become a couch potato who’s a mover,”
he said.
Source:http://msnbc.msn.com
|